I spent a lot of time studying a lot of successful cube lists. I spent a lot of time reading Tom LaPille's archives, Adam Prosak's writing, and especially Usman Jami. I studied what kinds of balance they designed into their cubes, balance between colors, card types, converted mana cost, and took note of the cards that seemed to keep appearing consistently across cubes that I knew to be of good quality.
I would really recommend anyone undertaking a cube project to spend a good amount of time planning their cube, and doing research. Researching Magic theory and design can be very difficult and frustrating. Always consider your sources. Anyone can login to MTGSalvation and throw up a list that's completely untested and consists of whatever popped into their head at the time. If you have attended Friday Night Magic anytime in the last 5 years, you may have realized there's a really wide spectrum of player skill and card evaluation ability out there. Getting a feel for how well an author understands the game and cards behind it will save you a lot of time in the long run.
So Usman Jami created a cube where all of the cards were split cards. One half would be something like Mirran Crusader and the other could be... Wrath of God. I thought this could make for some really interesting card interactions. Your hand size is essentially doubled, and drafting a balance of cards becomes even more key. Other strategies take on interesting dimensions, like graveyard recursion. If you cast a spell on one half of a card and it's in your graveyard, cards that interact both with spells and permanents in your graveyard will have twice as many targets.
Deciding on a split card cube does present a unique set of challenges as well. The effective card pool for the cube basically doubles in size. I decided on a 450 card cube, sufficient for 10 people to draft it. Going with a split card cube means that I needed to select 900 cards! Still, I thought the idea of the split cube presented a unique enough experience that would make people want to draft it more. We'll see if I've bitten off more than I can chew.
Hey, that's an interesting idea you got there. This is an interesting way to get more cards in your cube.
ReplyDeleteThe drafting and playing complexity that will arise when every card has two distinct uses may be mind boggling, though.
One thing I don't get about your list in Google Docs is why the cards are split between creatures and non-creatures. Several of the non-creatures have a creature counterpart, after all.
Looking forward for more posts. Good luck with the tinkering.